Terms and Conditions for Scientific Evaluation Review Process All Reviewed papers will undergo rigorous evaluation by the Scientific Committee. Reviewer comments must be relevant, constructive, and directly related to the research content. Acceptance Criteria If a paper is accepted without modifications, the reviewer must provide detailed justification for this decision. Reviews must be clear, unambiguous, and written exclusively in English to ensure compatibility with publishing standards. Rejection Criteria If a paper is rejected, the reviewer must clearly state the scientific reasons for rejection. Review Quality Standards Incomplete or overly brief reviews (e.g., lacking detailed feedback, vague statements, or insufficient justification) will not be considered valid in the evaluation process. Reviews must thoroughly assess the paper’s methodology, findings, and contribution to the field. Reviewer Recognition Upon successful completion of the evaluation, reviewers will receive a Scientific Reviewer Certificate (aligned with global standards and recognized for inclusion in Clarivate). Reviewer Comments Language : Non-English reviews will not be considered valid in the evaluation process.